Skip to content

2006-2017 Constitutional Challenges to Honduran Mining Laws

In 2006, a constitutional challenge was brought on behalf of 20 Honduran citizens, including representatives of the Honduran Association of Environmental and Agro-Forest Journalists (AHPAAF) and the Committee for the Defense and Development of the Gulf of Fonseca Plant and Wildlife, against the 1998 Mining Law. The Court found that 13 of the legislation’s provisions were unconstitutional, including a provision which allowed companies to expropriate the land of any person who did not reach an agreement with the mining company or opposed mining on his or her property. 

The 1998 Mining Law was ultimately replaced by the 2013 Mining Law (see Legal Action entitled, “1998-2013 Honduran Mining Laws” for more detail). This new law faced two separate constitutional challenges in 2014 brought by the Honduran Centre for the Promotion of Community Development (CEHPRODEC) and the Honduran Institute for Environmental Law (IDAMHO), among others. Of the 20 challenged provisions, 7 were found unconstitutional in a court decision released in June 2017. The impugned provisions included articles relating to, among other things, the use of natural resources by transnational corporations, control over vacant lands, and the use of mercury, cyanide, and lead in mining operations (Criterio.hn, 2017). 

As a result of the 2017 constitutional decision, the Honduran Institute of Geology and Mines (INHGEOMIN) advised that it had not approved any mining concessions during October 2017. However, according to a report published in March 2018 by the CEHPRODEC there were 302 registered metallic and non-metallic mining concessions, with an additional 193 requests in process at the INHGEOMIN as of September 2017. 

In 2019 and 2020, Congress approved reforms to the Mining Law to address the invalidation of articles by the 2017 Supreme Court ruling, and to make mining concessions more attractive for foreign investment by reducing the tax levy. Both reforms were criticised by Civil Society Organizations as reinforcing the Honduras’ dependence on the extractives model and weakening accountability of mining companies and environmental protections (Proceso hn, 2019, Criterio hn, 2020).

Type of Action / Tipo de Acción:
Constitutional Proceedings
Legal Description / Descripción Legal:
Resolution of the Supreme Court and Constitutional Court of Honduras in the constitutional challenge presented against the General Mining Law (1998), dated 4 October 2006;Resolution of the Supreme Court and Constitutional Court of Honduras in the constitutional challenge presented against the General Mining Law (2013), dated 23 June 2017
Extractive Project / Proyecto extractivo:
Region / Región:
Central America
Country / País:
Honduras
Natural Resource / Recurso natural:
Gold
Jurisdiction / Jurisdicción:
Honduran System
Category of Key Actors in Legal Action / Categoría de actores claves en la Acción Legal:
Civil Society Organizations, Grassroots Movements
Key Legal Actors Involved / Actores jurídicos clave involucrados:
Committee for the Defense and Development of the Gulf of Fonseca Plant and Wildlife, Honduran Association of Environmental and Agro-Forest Journalists (AHPAAF), Honduran Centre for the Promotion of Community Development (CEHPRODEC), Honduran Institute for Environmental Law (IDAMHO)
References / Referencias:

Criteria.hn, “Honduras registra 302 concesiones mineras; Cortés y Olancho encabezan la lista (VIDEO)”, dated 14 March 2018, online: https://criterio.hn/honduras-registra-302-concesiones-mineras-cortes-y-olancho-encabezan-la-lista/, accessed 7 October 2020.

Criteria.hn, “Poder Judicial declara inconstitucionales artículos de Ley de Minería”, dated 21 August 2017, online: https://criterio.hn/?s=%22Poder+Judicial+declara+inconstitucionales+art%C3%ADculos+de+Ley+de+Miner%C3%ADa, accessed 7 October 2020.

Criterio.hn, “Aprobados nuevos beneficios fiscales para empresas mineras en Congreso Nacional”, dated 15 October 2020, online: https://www.acafremin.org/es/noticias-regionales/honduras/805-aprobados-nuevos-beneficios-fiscales-para-empresas-mineras-en-congreso-nacional, accessed 10 December 2021.

El Heraldo, “Anuncian recurso contra Ley de Minería”, dated 7 April 2014, online: https://www.elheraldo.hn/pais/574544-214/anuncian-recurso-contra-ley-de-mineria, accessed 7 October 2020.

Honduprensa, “Honduran organizations fight to have Canadian-backed mining law declared unconstitutional”, dated 26 February 2015, online: https://honduprensa.wordpress.com/2015/02/26/honduran-organizations-fight-to-have-canadian-backed-mining-law-declared-unconstitutional/, accessed 2 July 2018.

Honduran Institute for Environmental Law (IDAMHO) and OXFAM , The San Marin mine in the Valle de Siria – Exploration, Exploration, Exploirtation and Closure (Executive Report) (Spanish) , August 2013, online: http://www.movimientom4.org/wp-content/docs/informe-mina-san%20martin-honduras.pdf, accessed 2 July 2018.

Nick Middeldorp, ‘In Honduras it is a Sin to Defend Life’: An Ethnography of the Discourses, Practices and Dangers of Opposition to Mining in Honduras, Wageningen University & Research, dated June 2014, online: https://www.iderechoambientalhonduras.org/es/node/263, accessed 7 October 2020.

MiningWatch Canada, “Honduran organization fight to have Canadian-backed mining law declared unconstitutional”, dated 26 February 2015, online: https://miningwatch.ca/blog/2015/2/26/honduran-organizations-fight-have-canadian-backed-mining-law-declared, accessed 7 October 2020.

Movimiento-M4, “Corte Suprema de Justicia de Honduras falla a favor de recurso de Inconstitucional de la ley de minería, dated 17 August 2017, online: https://www.stopcorporateimpunity.org/corte-suprema-de-justicia-de-honduras-falla-favor-de-recurso-de-inconstitucional-de-la-ley-de-mineria/?lang=es, accessed 7 October 2020.

Proceso hn, “CN aprobó reformas por adición de varios artículos a la Ley de General de Minería”, dated 26 septiembre 2019, online: https://proceso.hn/cn-aprobo-reformas-por-adicion-de-varios-articulos-a-la-ley-de-general-de-mineria/, accessed 10 December 2021.